IAMSANE's Blog - WHY HOMOSEXUALITY IS RIGHT AND CHRISTIANITY IS VERY WRONG .....

The following article appeared in the Mail Online Mar 09, 2011;

RULING WAS RIGHT ON CHRISTIAN COUPLE BANNED FROM FOSTERING BECAUSE OF BELIEFS ON HOMOSEXUALITY, SAYS PM

David Cameron has stepped into the row over the Christian couple who have been barred from fostering children because of their belief that homosexuality is wrong. He appeared to back the courts by saying Owen and Eunice Johns had been dealt with in an ‘appropriate way’, and added that Christians must be ‘tolerant and welcoming’ towards homosexuality.
His comments came days after Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith also publicly backed the ruling in the Johns case. Last night they provoked a backlash from Christian groups who feel their beliefs are being trampled on by Government equality laws. Former Tory Home Office minister Ann Widdecombe said: ‘It is high time the Government was “tolerant and welcoming and broad-minded” towards Christians. 'There is no balance at all now – Christian rights have been all but wiped out. The Prime Minister’s comments are extremely disappointing and ill-advised.’
Mrs Johns, a mother of four who has successfully fostered 15 children, said: ‘It is very surprising and disappointing Mr Cameron takes this view. He said he was a Christian, but after what he’s said today, I don’t know. Our right to express our views as Christians has been eroded as the rights of homosexuals are deemed more important.’
Mrs Johns, a 62-year-old retired nurse, and her 65-year-old husband had applied to Derby County Council to restart fostering after a break.
But social workers raised concerns that their views on homosexuality would conflict with equality laws. Earlier this month that view was upheld by the High Court.
The couple believe homosexuality is ‘against God’s law and morals’, but insist they are not homophobic and would ‘accept and love’ any child.
Asked about the case during a visit to Derby, Mr Cameron said: ‘This matter was decided by a court in the appropriate way and I think we should rest with the judgment that was made.’ Pressed on whether he thought Christian views were incompatible with an acceptance of homosexuality, he added: ‘Christians should be tolerant and welcoming and broad-minded.’
Government sources insisted that the Prime Minister was ‘not taking sides’ in the debate about whether gay rights should take precedence over Christian beliefs.
Andrea Williams, chief executive of the Christian Legal Centre, which backed the Johns’s case, said Mr Cameron appeared not to have understood the facts. ‘His comments are extraordinary. The Johns would never have refused to provide a loving home to any child,’ she added.
‘He seems to be saying that to play any role in public life Christians have to abandon the teachings of the Bible. Anyone who does not conform is branded as somehow phobic. It is fundamentally illiberal.’
Stephen Green, of the group Christian Voice, said there was a danger the judgement in the Johns’s case would be used to ban all Christians from any role in fostering or adopting children.
In January, Christian B&B owners Peter and Hazelmary Bull were ordered to pay damages to a gay couple to whom they had refused to let a room.
Last month it emerged that ministers are planning to allow gay marriages to take place in religious buildings, including churches.


The Pink News reported on the same story, from a more enlightened perspective;

A Christian couple who said they would not tell a child that being gay is okay have said they are “extremely distressed” at being banned from fostering. “We have been excluded because we have moral opinions based on our faith and we feel sidelined because we are Christians with normal, mainstream, Christian views on sexual ethics. The judges have suggested that our views might harm children. We have been told by the Equality and Human Rights Commission that our moral views may ‘infect’ a child.
Ben Summerskill, of gay rights charity Stonewall, said: ‘We’re delighted that the High Court’s landmark decision has favoured 21st-century decency above 19th-century prejudice. In any fostering case the interests of the 60,000 children in care should override the bias of any prospective parent. Thankfully, Mr and Mrs Johns’s out-dated views aren’t just out of step with the majority of people in modern Britain, but those of many Christians too. If you wish to be involved in the delivery of a public service, you should be prepared to provide it fairly to anyone.”

*

Firstly I would like to say that everyone has the right to be intolerant of individuals or groups of people over conflicting beliefs, but no-one has the right to express intolerance against anyone over something that is none of their business.
Secondly I would like to say that I agree with the decision to prevent this couple from infecting children with their misguided ideas about what humans are, but I am completely unimpressed by Cameron's sound bite because I know everything that he says comes from a place of negative intent. He wants to stir up the people of Britain, have them fuming with discontent; had he supported the couple he would have riled a few gay and human rights campaigners but by supported the decision of the court he has stirred up the larger number of people who are uncomfortable (for many reasons, not only religious) with homosexuality.
With regards to Christian attitudes towards homosexuality, do we really give a toss what they think ?  Do Christians deserve any rights ?  The answer is No - not as long as they wish other people to have less rights than they. Well-known Intolerance Monster Machine Ann Widdecombe who  left the Church of England over her intolerance of women priests and became a Roman Catholic is reported to have said "There is no balance at all now – Christian rights have been all but wiped out". Why should Christians have any rights ?  As a Christian you are a member of the largest and most brutal gang on this planet - a gang that has killed more people than any other gang. Christians continue to kill people, and if they don't kill them they brainwash them into accepting a system of beliefs that best suit their own personal agenda. They think of people as either Christian or non-Christian. DNA has no direct connection with religion, although the need to adopt popular but false beliefs as a method of reducing one's perception of humanity to the written word is of DNA as it could be seen as the manifestation of a mental disorder.
Does homosexuality have its origins in DNA ?  Many people, especially Christians, believe it is a manifestation of corrupt environmental or social conditioning, but unlike religion this is not the case. How can I be so sure about this ?  Well, I am homosexual and the earliest indication that I am sexually inclined towards males occurred while I was an infant. I recall acting on my feelings of attraction to male sexual organs around the age of seven or eight. This was not due to influences from my environment. There were no homosexual influences, except negative ones. I can remember being at home with my mother at some time during the 1970's. My uncle, at the time in his twenties, visited and he raised the issue of a television programme he had seen the previous evening which dealt with homosexuality in the UK. His opinion was that homosexuality was wrong; he seemed to me as I sat there absorbing the conversation a very angry man. My mother's response was that it took all sorts to make the world go round. I knew what they were discussing related to me even though it is likely I did not know what homosexuality was, but my uncle would probably have used a derogatory term that I did recognise. The conversation had a profound effect, hence the reason that thirty five years later it remains in my memory.
I was born in 1967 and this was the year that saw the decriminalisation of homosexual acts in private between two men, as long as both men were twenty one or over. The years of discrimination and acceptable hostility towards homosexuals had an effect on a generation of men that has lasted long beyond the decriminalisation - the narrow minds of the many and the stigma of being branded a Queer or Faggot - and the threat of imprisonment, has literally caused at least tens of thousands of men to live a life that conforms to the 'norms' whilst carrying with them a 'terrible' secret. I have encountered many who were young men when it was a disgrace to be exposed as homosexual and they find ways of being with men, and then return to their life as a family man; wife, grown up off-spring.

That homosexuality was ever illegal is completely sick !  Laws to control the sexual behaviour of two consenting adults are out of order !  Christians are happy to see men fighting wars but when it comes to two men physically intimate with each other this stretches their tolerance. In 2009 three evangelists from the US went to Uganda to speak at a conference that conference organiser Stephen Langa said was about ''the gay agenda - that whole hidden and dark agenda''. The conference was attended by thousands and the visitors from the US are said to have suggested it was acceptable to kill homosexuals. They also claimed that homosexuals were recruiting the country's children. A reporter from Uganda spoke from Uganda on a TV news programme after the murder of David Kato (a homosexual who refused to hide himself away in a dark closet) about how the attitude of Ugandans had hardened towards homosexuals. He stopped people on a street and asked them how they felt about homosexuals. This is a highly Christianised part of the world. One young woman said, with a smile on her face; 'I think homosexuals should be put in prison', then added 'or killed'.
What this woman is suggesting is that I should be killed. She would probably attend my slaughter and leave believing she to be the better person than the pervert scum on his way to Hell and eternal damnation. She is a fucking abomination !
  
Homosexuals have suffered more persecution than Christians and continue to do so, even here in the UK where things are 'thought' to be easier. Try telling someone who faces violence on a daily basis because of his sexuality that he is lucky to be living in the UK. I have had my fair share of it and I am sickened by comments such as those by these Christian foster parents who have been prevented from continuing to foster because of their attitude towards same sex relationships. They say they wouldn't love a homosexual child any less than another but imagine growing up with people who are liable to tell a homosexual child that God disapproves of the way they are and that they share those views. They are a disgrace, an expression of a lack of consciousness or awareness of other peoples needs and desires and how necessary it is to allow people the freedom to achieve personal fulfilment.
Does anyone think it would be a splendid idea to allow white racists, who believe in genetic and cultural superiority over black people, to foster black children ?

Having said all that I believe no-one should be given any rights by Law because these only compensate us for the human rights that are taken from us at birth. These are dealt back to us in small measures throughout our enslavement by the state, and then removed again to make the chains we carry that much heavier.
There is a dark agenda playing out here, as suggested by the Christian anti-gay activist named above, but homosexuals are not its creators. The instigators are in the background, instructing politicians which way to go in the debates about the promotion of a same sex relations. There is widespread discomfort over this issue and when newspapers report that five year old's are to be taught about homosexuality in schools - etc - this is to escalate the fear induced by the subject and perceive homosexuals as dangerous. People react with horror, and this is the reaction that was intended by those who want people to continue to discriminate and hate. Homosexuality is being used, has been used.
There was a hidden agenda in decriminalising it in the first place. If there is a perceived unwanted element in society then it is better to have them out in  the open than going underground. It is better that this element, in this case homosexuals, trust rather than be suspicious of authority because this means it is easier to get to these people. And we have been targeted in many ways, most brutally with the creation of the AIDS virus. It is commonly thought that AIDS started in Africa but this is untrue. The first reported outbreaks were in Manhattan in the US just months after thousands of gay men were encouraged to take part in a government-sponsored hepatitis B vaccine experiments in  New York, Los Angeles, and  San Francisco. I wonder if those responsible for this would consider themselves Christians. Would not be at all surprised.

One final thing - if you are not a homosexual your views on homosexuality are not welcome - they have no value - you are not qualified to speak - SO SHUT THE FUCK UP !  And Christians - if you have an unshakable knowing that those who you perceive as sinners will one day face judgement from your God then leave it to 'him' to deal with us and stop using your retarded views as justification for bashing people harder that you bash your bible - the book that was written and rewritten many times by men in order to control the thoughts and behaviour of the moronic amongst us.