IAMSANE's Blog - THE FOOD CHAIN AND THE RIPPLE EFFECT ..... Part Two

The main argument in support of The Food Chain is that it is natural that humans eat meat. This is the basis on which eating meat has been made virtually compulsory; we are born into it and if we question the system we face opposition from those who would rather not look at how their behaviour creates a hellish horror here on earth. We'd rather cite our teeth as the evidence that what we are doing is correct, but the person who suggested our teeth are designed to tear through flesh was protecting his own feelings about eating meat. He was probably not a vegetarian. Canine teeth are implicated as evidence that we are designed to eat meat but it seems there is more evidence to suggest that humans are not behaving naturally by eating animals that is strengthened by the psychological impact the act has on individuals:

'While carnivores take pleasure in killing animals and eating their raw flesh, any human who killed an animal with his or her bare hands and dug into the raw corpse would be considered deranged. Carnivorous animals are aroused by the scent of blood and the thrill of the chase. Most humans, on the other hand, are revolted by the sight of raw flesh and cannot tolerate hearing the screams of animals being ripped apart and killed. The bloody reality of eating animals is innately repulsive to us, more proof that we were not designed to eat meat. It is obvious that our natural instincts are non-carnivorous. Most people have other people kill their meat for them and would be sickened if they had to do the killing themselves. Instead of eating raw meat as all flesh-eating animals do, humans boil, bake, or fry it and disguise it with all kinds of sauces and spices so that it bears no resemblance to its raw state' (Found at http://www.peta.org/living/vegetarian-living/The-Natural-Human-Diet.aspx).

Examples of this cognitive dysfunction can be seen and heard whenever you switch on the television or radio; the human personality is riddled with it. Recently I saw an episode of ch4's 'Come Dine With Me' in which a woman described herself as very spiritual but went on to eat the animal parts served up to her except those which she found repulsive and these she secretly deposited in a plastic bag and dropped on the floor. THE ANIMALS!!! All that suffering and it comes to this; not even being eaten. Spirituality is not compatible with the endorsement of the meat industry. A radio presenter who clearly believes his perception of what is going on in the world is clear and balanced says that he really enjoys eating meat as long as it is sufficiently disguised, he cannot eat meat that has the appearance of part of an animal. This is very common. I would go so far as to say human beings are insane.

We refer to animals as dumb creatures but if they had the thought power to coordinate a rebellion against their captors and abusers I think they would. We have that capacity and we do nothing. Some children often make at some stage the connection between what they see on their dinner plates and the cows and sheep in the fields, or the animated pig with human speech, while others make no connection whatsoever. They are discouraged from thinking too deeply about the conflict between the animal as a remote icon, the poster on the wall, the cuddly toy, and the cruelty and bloody slaughter.
The wrongness in the mass farming and consumption of animals is reflected in the damage meat does to human health. Cancer, heart disease, obesity, and there are the hormones that animals are fed such as steroids that can cause violent behaviour in humans and infiltrate the water supply so in the end even non-meat eaters are at risk.

You probably think you have more freedom than the average factory-farmed animal but this might not be true. The value of animals is in their slaughter and until they they get their food, not always the right kind and often too much, while man is put to work in order that he earns the money with which he can then buy his food (often the wrong kind and far too much of it!) to fuel his continued slavedom. This process we perceive as freedom; the freedom to choose which corporation we work for and the freedom to eat and to choose which foods we eat. Or so we think. We are not free because we are robots, unable to perceive the inauthenticity of our behaviour because we are programmed to believe we are acting naturally. The major obstacle for improving cognitive dissonance in humans is the over-riding of the program that prevents us from seeing the food chain for what it is - A system that is the cause of a major crack in the balance of the collective mind that should connect us to all there is but we will be disconnected until there is no longer a place for us in the food chain.

The system that so conveniently binds us to the con that is the food chain began as a suggestion. In fact everything we perceive about us began its life as a mere suggestion. They are of varying degrees of importance and cover everything from what style of clothes we should be wearing to whose ideas we should be supporting, be adopting as our own, and spreading like a virus through society. Our personal identities are largely recognised by our interests and beliefs, which are suggestions that manifested through mass acceptance. This is why it is very challenging for those deeply embedded in the system to disconnect from it and why so many humans think about the meat on the end of the fork but only for a moment, or become vegetarian then return to meat.  
We are a suggestion box, nothing more, nothing less. The rules we obey and the daily/weekly/monthly/yearly rituals are the manifestation of suggestions. Suggestions are delivered to us by those in authority (government) or 'experts' in fields such as science etc., about which most people know nothing in the first place. When a 'new' idea, concept, way of thinking/behaving is targeted at us it is entirely up to us how much validity the suggestion gathers. We could ignore the information coming from those who manipulate us through suggestion but rarely do. We are hoarders, not just of physical clutter but of information, therefore we manifest suggestion into our physical world by acceptance. Once accepted we then either support the suggestion or oppose it. This is how suggestions become cornerstones that support the infrastructure of this bizarre construct we tolerate, support, endorse through acceptance.
For a concept to survive that really has no solid foundation it must draw energy from its hosts - human beings. To do this effectively it must appeal to motives individuals are looking for an excuse to exploit. Though we are a disparate bunch we are always looking for an excuse to group with others which is why protests are so popular (but largely unsuccessful because we are not very good at forming a unit in which everyone is acting towards the same goal, at least here in the UK). We seek reason to express our opinions which are often far from reasoned and find others with whom to agree or argue with.
It is safe to have an opinion but we should express them with less fervour as they can be dangerous, lethal, especially if coming from one with influence in the media. Opinions are prone to change because they are generally adopted before the gathering of evidence and formed through reaction rather than reasoned unbiased rumination. Suggestions prey on our need to group and while we get together to share our opinions and create heavy disagreements, even enemies of those who oppose us, the concept has become real to us. Its power is strengthened by the support and the opposition which act like two magnets sitting side by side. Magnetic polarity is what keeps tradition very much part of the now. Negative and Positive are on the same side creating what appears solid, unmoveable, yet it only exists in this form because we had it suggested to us and we accepted it, therefore it is perceived to be reality, but it is merely information made concrete.
Our reaction to a suggestion is implicit within the suggestion itself. Nothing is simply suggested; it is suggested in a way that ensures the desired outcome is achieved. We do the same thing in our dealings with others; I am not suggesting that suggestions are a bad thing, it is the intent behind the suggestion that must be looked into. What I am doing here is suggesting to you that supporting any exploitation and cruelty of other beings here on earth has led to a situation in which humans will never be treated fairly. Suggestions are clothed in emotional tags, particularly fear, whether it be how would you be perceived by others if you walked out on a miserable marriage or how might life be if there was no government and we lived in a world ruled (?) by anarchy!
Our rebellion against this incarceration by rules and regulations is suppressed by the corruption of the concept of anarchy. But, take the popular definition of anarchy as perpetuated by the media and apply it not to an imagined terrible future possibility but to NOW. The scrapping of law and order generally creates within one's mind the image of chaos, but we are living in a world in which, as you read this, people are dying of hunger, being tortured, washed away by floods, sexually abused, murdered, crushed by cars on roads, being incinerated by 'accidental' fires, mistreated by parents, the education and the medical system, verbally and physically abused, there are wars in which tens of thousands of people are killed, the slaughter of millions of animals everyday without fail because there is money involved in the murder of these invalidated creatures; and humans are kept as slaves as a source of energy to fuel the machine system in which we are invalidated human parts. This imposition that limits our experience on earth manifests as misery, depression, premature death, and all this = CHAOS. The opposite of chaotic is stable, predictable, and life on earth is neither of these things.
We live in a world of chaos (though the natural order of the universe is anything but chaotic) and proof of this is in our habit of living in either the past or the future. If we did not live in a world of chaos we would be compelled to value the now, but the now has been infected by the chaos - the reality we see endorsed by newspapers and regular televised news updates, usually comprised of a series of reports that spread fear, anger, anxiety. This chaos is very much by design; which is why from the chaos is not manifesting order. The chaos is very effectively organised; the more chaotic we are encouraged to believe our lives are the less likely it is we will find the time to question the nature of our existence on earth and realise how poor and non-essential it is. Many people get as far as seeing how crap life is but don't delve far enough into the deception to know why and what can be done to change this.
At the head of the deception is the protection of the food chain. We MUST if we are to sink further into servitude continue to overlook the psychological and physical sickness that comes from our endorsement of this ritualistic practice otherwise we risk developing a conscience and this is bad news for Authority who wish to control us, and the energetic beings who feed off the energy that we generate. It could be that the beings influence us by direct influence over those who rule us. Or they may know how to influence our DNA.

You may not readily think of yourself as a prisoner, never mind a slave, but consider the truth in this:

       YOU CAN HAVE YOUR OWN WAY IF YOU PROMISE TO OBEY.

This is how it is on earth, and it will continue as long as we invalidate the worth of animals and kill them and make meat of them. As long as we are in denial we will remain perched at what we think is the top of the food chain, and the organised chaos will go on ruling life on earth. From natural manifestation of chaos springs order but from this chaos more chaos. We are damaged, but not beyond repair; ultimately it is our mind that is being controlled and this is good for us because it is much easier to alter one's mind-set than it is to restructure the physical reality one lives in. In fact since our environment is a product of our mind it is essential to tackle the roots of the food chain which have been so firmly embedded in the human mind.
Cognitive Reform is necessary and this involves looking at all aspects of one's behaviour and correcting that which best serves the DNA in terms of survival (physical) while supressing the fulfillment of soul's deeper needs (meta-physical).  


THE ORIGINS OF HUMAN COGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION?

A man is a biological machine.
This machine is operated by information encoded in DNA.
The body is also a vehicle for human consciousness. During the period of human history on earth known as the golden age, the spirit, or soul, was the primary decision maker, manifesting experience that was most beneficial for the development of spiritual awareness.
The period in which this was the direction of human life on earth was a time of great balance and stability of environment thus the human spiritual entities had the freedom to persue their life purpose without the disruptive influence of an unstable planet ..... not that consciousness fears death because it is aware of the nature of the game and that energy/spirit cannot be destroyed.
It has been suggested that during the golden age humans were very different to those witnessed today and possibly for millions of years since. There was one gender, spiritual beings who chose when to be born and when to expire, who communicated telepathically; Birth and Death were not how we now perceive them. They sourced energy from the energetic forces about them, which were apparent, as awareness of the human situation was then much greater than it has been since the human cognitive breakdown occurred.
The human body/biological machine is a cellular community that is here for reasons as yet not understood by man. Man will not face the deeper possibilities of existence because what emerges when one does this is not compatible with how we perceive ourselves. Are we not the pinnacle of God's achievements? Top o' the food chain? The only intelligent life in the universe? Look closer; we are comprised of DNA, but what is DNA? To those who have speculated on the nature of DNA from a higher level of awareness than the average scientist it is a crystaline transmitter and receiver of information akin to an electronic microchip. To others it is a microscopic community or even an alien race that have created bodies, or survival machines (us), in which to disguise and protect themselves from some form of intergalactic predator. If this community is hiding itself as the form of being that became known as human then it would wish to remain as inconspicuous as possible and human bodies were an ideal cover during the golden age when the body and mind existed in harmony. Each with a purpose, each carrying out that purpose in very direct ways. No confusion, no conflict, no complexity of relationships. The period of calm and tranquility benefited both parties involved in the integration of a complete human, but then something happened which caused the manifestation of a drastic destablisation from which we are yet to recover.

We know that the earth has endured periods of great instability, that major quakes, floods, famine etc. have caused widespread devastation on the surface of the earth and wiped out much of the life that plays upon it. To lesser extents this has continued until today. It seems that somewhere on earth a major 'natural' disaster is playing out and devastating people's lives (I say 'natural' because there has been in existence for a long time technology that can manipulate conditions here on earth - it is bound to have been used).
After a lengthy period of peace on a stable earth - the golden age - a trembling and opening up of the earth would have had a massive impact on the beings inside the beings; human DNA. An impact that suddenly put DNA survival at risk and triggered the release of until then dormant information encoded in the DNA which was pre-programmed for such an emergency or else manifested through the desperate attempts of DNA to survive. We are not made of dead stuff - our bodies have an agenda that over-shadowed that of the spirit when the survival program kicked in. The DNA took the controls from the sophisticated higher consciousness as the driver of the human experience and took human life in a direction opposed to that which it had been going.
Fear was the trigger. Fear of being killed unlocked the survival mechanism for the DNA. The original spirit know that death is nothing to be feared but the body, the DNA, when in peril, has a strong will to survive. It must survive, and this urgency, previously unknown to the body because of the peaceful nature of life on earth, manifested a personality so solid that it dominated and continued to rule the human identity and does to this day.
This personality is pure DNA and we can see this now in how DNA can be used to identify a person. If you thought the government had too much influence over our lives that is nothing compared with that which DNA has over us. Mainstream scientific experiments with DNA must be treated with suspicion if DNA does not wished to be fully observed/understood. About 95% human DNA has been labelled Junk DNA because it doesn't appear to have an apparent function and is therefore obsolete in its current genome. The refer to this as Junk is incredibly naive - it must be Junk because science cannot not figure out a reason for it's existence? With DNA we are potentially dealing with something that wishes to evade our conscious observation. When DNA is observed by humans it is a lower part of the program observing a higher part that are both parts of the same program. DNA observing DNA, unless the observer has an integrated personality that has a DNA point of observation balanced with a higher awareness, with the latter a filter for DNA information. DNA has gone to a great deal of effort to mould us to best increase its survival.
DNA is the model on which society is formed. The lower levels of society are controlled by the higher levels who strive not only to control the behaviour of the lower levels through laws and the mesmerising media onslaught through television, newspapers and Hollywood blockbusters but also to keep the lower levels in the dark as to how the higher levels operate. The lower levels are brainwashed into thinking they know who these higher levels are while those at the highest of levels hide themselves behind the 'front-line' of politicians, celebrities, etc.

DNA has programmed us to clothe it, to buy it a house to live in, which we work our whole lives to pay for, to think more of those who are related to us by blood than those that aren't. Families are DNA protection units and a house it's fortress. We have protected the interests of the DNA by spending most of our lives inside a large box made of secured bricks. We fear for our lives, are compelled to make ourselves as comfortable and secure as possible and to know who comprise the 'tribe' and be suspicious of outsiders. We are afraid of the world in which we live and we cannot really justify that fear.

Thousands of years ago the earth behaved in a way that was uncharacteristic; DNA was no longer safe in it's survival machine - humans. If, as I mention above, DNA is an alien race in hiding from a predator, it could be that at some point the predator found what it had been searching for and targeted first the planet on which the aliens/DNA had settled before directly influencing the DNA/aliens, and continued to do so right up to now.  As humans we were genetically modified and turned into slaves.
Remember what Don Juan, the Mexican Yaqui Indian shaman, told Carlos Castaneda : "We have a predator that came from the depths of the cosmos and took over the rule of our lives. Human beings are its prisoners. The Predator is our lord and master. It has rendered us docile, helpless. If we want to protest, it suppresses our protest. If we want to act independently, it demands that we don't do so... I have been beating around the bush all this time, insinuating to you that something is holding us prisoner. Indeed we are held prisoner!"
The five senses were increased to overpower previously dominant higher senses in order to narrow our range of perception. I feel the microscopic communities that move around disguised as human bodies have been separated and forced into very competitive relationships with other communities/bodies, and compelled to be suspicious of each other.
Occasionally we are nagged by a higher level of awareness. Never more so then when we question our relationship with animals and what is served up of them on our dinner plates.
We all have two personalities; that of our higher self and that which was the product of fear and the program to survive. This split into two personalities (certainly something to do with an inducement of fear on a grand scale) is the cause of much of human dysfunctional behaviour. I have heard it said many times that most people are fundamentally kind and good, and this may be true, but I judge people by how they behave and if I am walking along a pavement and coming towards me is someone who is looking directly into my eyes and I acknowledge them by smiling and they block acknowledgement of me and retain their glassy stare (not a rare occurrence), we are dealing with the cognitively fragmented. Some people look away then smile and this is the DNA reaction followed by the interjection of consciousness acting to retain it's connection to other humans.
Humans are faulty. Compelled into a system that makes them miserable; no-one wants to slave away at a job that has no personal rewards other than the hourly rate of pay, and if they do we must ask why it is we cannot occupy ourselves as all other life on earth manages to do. It is because we are not complete beings. We live in a world of distraction (TV, media, film) inside a world of distraction (work, appointments, daily routine). The expectations of family and friends, social status, informs the development of our physical identity which is inauthentic. It is prone to change because it is incomplete. It seeks to build itself up, hoarding information and physical property as a defence against attack, any dangers. This personality is deeply flawed, full of contradiction, and in need of reigning in. The balance must be restored between the control of the body computer and the essential spirit that manifests as consciousness in a human. Presently most humans lack conscious awareness of the situation on earth. We look to 'experts' to give us the answer to the meaning of life. We lack individual creative spirit. The system with its rules, regulations, laws, morals, the pressure one is put under to conform to the codes of acceptable behaviour, opinions, dress, lifestyle, has retarded human behaviour.
A major factor in keeping us this way is the lack of acknowledgement given to the influence of DNA, especially in the sexual awakening of young people. Replication through male/female intercourse is crucial for DNA survival and this is not considered when discussing the perceived problem of teenage pregnancies. Because of our genes/DNA we may resemble a parent/grandparent, we may be prone to certain diseases or illnesses, or have hair colour that runs in the family. We accept this, but we ignore the control of DNA once the body becomes a sexually reproductive organism. We stigmatise those who act on behalf of their DNA and begin sexual activity before the legal age of consent, and this is further proof that humans are completely stupid.
We appear to be the victims of a program that aims to turn us into non-entities. Most humans are not conscious of their spirit and the plan is certainly to disconnect us from reminders that we are biological entities. We are machine parts and to be an efficient machine part we need to be rid of biological functions that force us to vacate our positions. Functions such as going to the toilet. On television currently there is an advert for a pharmaceutical that carries claims of preventing people from needing to urinate as often as they do. The ad shows a woman as a machine part behind a conveyor belt at a supermarket checkout. Instead of seeing the goods the costomer wishes to purchase she sees miniature lavatories.
From early childhood we are led to believe that needing to urinate often is somehow wrong. At school it is used against us, particularly those whom teachers have taken a dislike to, and children desperate to relieve themselves are made to wait until the end of lesson, or humiliated for needing the toilet more often than others. This can lead to a lifetime of bladder-based psychological damage. Some people drink much less than they need to be in good health and well hydrated simply to stem the flow because of the inconvenience of fitting visits to the toilet into their busy lifestyles.
As we can see it is becoming more and more difficult here in the UK to find a public toilet in the towns and cities and this is obviously part of the agenda; to turn the need to pass water into a major issue for people in this country.
We should consciously embrace the biological brilliance and balance of our bodies that is due to our DNA but instead we are battling it with weapons created by pharmaceutical companies whose incentives should be treated with suspicion. It is worrying when people who do not fully understand the human body and all it's intricacies are creating drugs that tamper with the workings of the human body.

Intelligence has nothing to do with how much information is readily accessable to the personality. Education is promoted as essential in ensuring a bright future for humanity but in fact it ensures that humans will be led into Orwell's 1984 - style bondage. Education is the medium by which children are indoctrinated in the ways of living that the system has imposed upon us. All information is completely worthless if our cognitive abilities are faulty. We have many regrets as a collective. We must aim for reform that banishes regret and guilt from human experience. The education system is set up to completely ignore the human spirit that is gradually suppressed so that when the child becomes an adult a false identity is fixed in place and the way of the system is his way of life. The light that should burn bright within us has been reduced to a spark that is just enough to keep us alive - nothing more.  

POPULAR OPPOSITIONS TO THE SUGGESTION THAT EATING ANIMALS IS UNNATURAL HUMAN BEHAVIOUR :

HUMANS REQUIRE MEAT IN ORDER TO BE HEALTHY.

This from an article found at http://www.theproteinmyth.com.

The Protein Myth :              

'Real truth behind protein? Protein causes disease? Best sources of protein?
What Is The Protein Myth? If you regularly hear how important getting your protein is, you know you’re listening to a myth.
You see, the human body requires a moderate amount of protein. If you eat the standard American diet (S.A.D.) you are more likely getting too much protein, along with excess fat and complex carbohydrates that is evidenced in our quite high and rising obesity rates.
Mother’s milk, the essential food for babies during their fastest growth spurts, averages just 7% of its calories from protein. This complete food allows an infant to amazingly grow by as much as 12 pounds in just 6 months.
'Yes, healthy and complete protein is an important part of your diet. It was the first nutrient to be discovered and named and is vital to building, repairing and maintaining tissues in your body. Amino acids and are the building blocks of protein and 9 of the 20 amino acids that the body itself can’t produce is synthesized through the food we eat.
These amino acids can abundantly be found in plant based foods, where the animals get them, like cabbage, broccoli, cucumbers, tomatoes, kale and many more plant foods.
'The myth can be traced to two incidents in history.
'The first was a statement made by Frances Moore Lappe in her best selling book ‘Diet For A Small Planet’ where she indicated that plant proteins were ‘incomplete’. 20 years later she recanted her theory saying she was badly mistaken (and other research has disproved her original theory as well), but far fewer people read those less popular writings and believe the flawed theory to this day. We do need all of the essential amino acids and plant foods do have them. However we don’t need them at every meal, every day since our body stores and recycles them. You can easily meet your daily protein (amino acid) requirements on a plant based diet.
The second is the meat, fish and poultry industries.
'In order to sustain growth and profits in the meat industry, their trade associations promote meat as the only good source of protein. You hear everything from cowboy commercials on Radio Disney brainwashing elementary school children that ‘real cowboys’ eat beef and steak that make them strong and build healthy bones, to magazine and radio commercials touting the virtues of lean beef as healthy and complete sources of protein. The poultry and fish industries also promote, although not as obvious. The virtues of chicken and fish protein as healthy is often promoted through so called mainstream articles written in health related magazines and publications. These articles are written by dietitians, doctors, researchers and reporters often funded indirectly by associations promoting these industries to make sure consumers continue to buy'.

Recently I raised the subject I am discussing here before several people. Two of those people were once vegetarians who now eat meat. They agreed with each other that when they ate meat after a long period of not doing so they immediately knew that they needed meat in order to feel healthy. One of these chaps told me he loved animals. The same person exclaimed that there was nothing worse that vegetarians, and especially vegans, banging on about not eating meat. I would suggest that there is something far worse than militant veggies and that is the slavery and slaughter of billions of animals across the planet.

ANIMALS EAT ANIMALS SO WHY SHOULDN'T WE EAT THEM.

The food chain is so well protected! In what other example of human behaviour would we use as justification the idea that animals do it therefore why shouldn't we? Animals excrete into the earth so why shouldn't we? No other. My feelings about animals eating other animals is that it has nothing to do with us what the animals do and it should be left up to them to find a way out of their part in the food chain. It could be that they were programmed to eat each other so that we would perceive this as evidence of the food chain being natural and accepting without question what is, even if you rule out animal welfare and vampiric aliens, the biggest mistake humans have made. I should clarify; the farming of animals and killing of animals for food, or sport, is humanities greatest mistake - if you want to eat the flesh of an animal that has died or natural causes then go ahead and face no other-dimensional consequence.  

Here a concerned brother alerts his sister to the dangers of continuing to support the meat industry. The entire letter from which the following was extracted can be found at http://www.drba.org/dharma/veggie/dearsis.asp

".... People forget that in eating animals, the entire animal life force also fills up your life force. The fear, anger, agony and vengeance that fill up every cell of the animal at the moment of death will also fill up every cell of the person who eats the animal. If you consider the sum total animal flesh eaten by the average person, do you know if there is any part of his blood supply, body cells or psyche which is not contaminated by those toxic animal energy? Think about this. At the rate people are gobbling up meat, retribution couldn’t wait until the next life; retribution manifests in the very present life. The escalating diseases that I just mentioned suffered by meat eaters result from just their individual karma. Their collective killing karma is manifested in the alarming number of murders, wars, calamities such as earthquakes, floods, tornadoes, accidents, fires, etc.
"Being an animal is no fun! Believe me! Who do you think are those getting reborn as chickens and cows everyday? And being killed everyday? They are the previous humans who ate animals without compassion. As humans they had no concern whatsoever for the fear, pain or agony of those poor animals. So the humans eventually end up being reborn as those animals only to be eaten by others. So the vicious cycle repeats itself ad infinitum.
The meat eater incurs more killing karma than the butcher, because you paid him to kill. It is like paying an assassin. So, don’t be naive in thinking you are absolved from the killing karma."

THE PURPOSE OF ANIMALS ON EARTH IS TO PROVIDE HUMANS WITH FOOD. THEY HAVE NO OTHER PURPOSE.

..... And so it will be that the sole purpose of human life is to provide this other-dimensional parasite with the energy to thrive. We will have no other purpose. This is as it will be for humans unless we over-ride the food chain program and access the memory of the true value of animal presence on earth and nurture a conscience in which a shift from the program to the creative can be felt. Animals do have a role and our intervention or interference has disconnected them from their part in life on earth. Animals have many purposes and one of these is to simply walk across the earth and give the soil beneath them some movement, to make it fertile. To eat the grass and digest it and give the waste back to the soil. You might see this as a very useless existence but what animals do has far more vitality than what human's generally get up to during their allotted time on earth. Humans stampede across the landscape observing the planet as though it was not of them and systematically destroy it.  

We ask: Is It Natural For humans To Eat The Flesh And Organs And Limbs Of Animals? Well this is a question that will be debated for eternity, meanwhile the food chain and the slaughter it ent(r)ails prevails. We need to look at things in a new way, we need to ask: Knowing That Animals Are Conscious Entities That Are Capable Of Displaying Qualities Of Awareness That Humans Often Perceive As Comparable To Their Own, Is It Right That The Fate Of Certain Animals Is To End Up On Our Dinner Plates? This is a question that cannot be debated forever without resolve since whatever your feelings about the meat industry it has to be true that the original intention of animal life on earth was NOT that many of these great creatures should be exploited by humans, slaughtered in their prime in terms of cuts, therefore reduced to business transactions and financial profit.

It is crucial now that we stop eating meat for the sake of the future of humanity. If we all raised our consciousness and thought about what is supported every time meat is purchased and the consequence of all that on humans and the animals who are conscious beings who have had their freedom removed, injected with hormones, steroids, numbered. The problem is most humans think they are not only at the top of the food chain but the most evolved creature on earth and have removed themselves from being part of the animal kingdom, except in their place in the food chain. We have to review the stuff we endorse by, often through being tricked into, giving our consent. Most urgently because how animals have and are being treated - fed a concoction of drugs - micro-chipped - this is what is in store for humans and it makes sense when you see the food chain in the ways I have been describing. Discounting the other-dimensional entities it could be said that Karmic returns may warrant humanity being enslaved as humanity has done to the animals. But Karma is the result of actions and intention largely generated by the system we act and live and die in - at the core is the system and the food chain.

How To Get Humans To Give Consent To Being Used As Food?

Get them to acknowledge and accept the food chain concept and then compliantly take their place in that food chain.